Foreskin restorers: insights into motivations, successes, challenges, and experiences with medical and mental health professionals – An abridged summary of key findings (2024)

  • Earp B, Sardi L, Jellison W. False beliefs predict increased circumcision satisfaction in a sample of US American men. Cult Health Sex. 2018;20:945–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2017.1400104.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Moore P. Younger Americans less supportive of circumcision at birth. 2015. https://today.yougov.com/topics/society/articles-reports/2015/02/03/younger-americans-circumcision.

  • Doyle D. Ritual male circumcision: a brief history. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2005;35:279–85.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Gollaher D. Circumcision: a history of the world’s most controversial surgery. New York: Basic Books; 2000.

  • Glick L. Marked in your flesh: circumcision from ancient Judea to modern America. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.

  • Board of Trustees. American Medical Association. Definition of Surgery H-475.983. 2003. https://policysearch.ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/surgery?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD.xml-0-4317.xml.

  • Maeda J, Chari R, Elixhauser A. Circumcisions in U.S. community hospitals, 2009. In: HCUP Statistical Brief #126. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality;2012. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb126.pdf.

  • Zhang X, Shinde S, Kilmarx P, Chen R, Cox S, Warner L, et al. Trends in in-hospital newborn male circumcision: United States, 1999–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:1167–8. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6034a4.htm.

    Google Scholar

  • Chapin G. Intact America. Don’t Ask. Don’t Sell®. 2022. https://intactamerica.org/dont-ask-dont-sell/.

  • Serody M. More than 5 million American men may want their foreskins back. Foregen/YouGov. 2021. https://www.foregen.org/commentarium-articles/yougov-survey-2021.

  • Hall R. Epispasm: circumcision in reverse. Bible Review. 1992:52–7. Available from: http://www.cirp.org/library/restoration/hall1/.

  • Penn J. Penile reform. Br J Plast Surg. 1963;16:287–8. http://www.cirp.org/library/restoration/penn1/.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Greer D, Mohl P, Sheley K. A technique for foreskin reconstruction and some preliminary results. J Sex Res. 1982;18:324–30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3812166.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Goodwin W. Uncircumcision: a technique for plastic reconstruction of a prepuce after circumcision. J Urol. 1990;144:1203–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39693-3.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Haseebuddin M, Brandes S. The prepuce: preservation and reconstruction. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18:575–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e328311c9c2.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Bossio J, Pukall C. Attitude toward one’s circumcision status is more important than actual circumcision status for men’s body image and sexual functioning. Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47:771–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1064-8.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Uberoi M, Abdulcadir J, Ohl D, Santiago J, Rana G, Anderson J. Potentially under-recognized late-stage physical and psychosexual complications of non-therapeutic neonatal penile circumcision: a qualitative and quantitative analysis of self-reports from an online community forum. Int J Impot Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00619-8.

  • New foreskin. Coverage index: how much foreskin do you have? 2022. www.restoringforeskin.org/coverage-index/CI-chart.htm.

  • World population review. Circumcision rates by state 2022. https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/circumcision-rates-by-state.

  • Hammond T. A cut by any other name: a deep-dive interview with ethicist Brian Earp (Parts 1 & 2). Empty Closet. 2020. Available from: http://circumcisionharm.org/images-circharm.org/2020%20EC%20Earp%20interview%20Pt1&2%20(May-Jun).pdf

  • Ehrenreich N, Barr M. Intersex surgery, female genital cutting, and the selective condemnation of ‘cultural practices’. Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev. 2005;40:71–140.

    Google Scholar

  • Ziemińska R. The epistemic injustice expressed in “normalizing” surgery on children with intersex traits. Diametros. 2020;17:52–65. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1478.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Tortorella v Castro. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3, California. Case No. B184043. Decided: June 01, 2006 https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8009703171466596993&q=Tortorella+v+Castro&hl=en&as_sdt=40000006.

  • American Academy of Pediatrics. Report of the task force on circumcision. Pediatrics. 1989;84:388–91.

    Article Google Scholar

  • American Academy of Pediatrics. Task force on circumcision. Technical report on male circumcision. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e756–85. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1990.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Fahmy MAB. Complications of male circumcision (ch 7–12). In: Fahmy MAB, editor. Complications of male circumcision. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2017. p. 49–170.

  • Stanford Medicine. Complications of circumcision. Newborn Nursery/Professional Education. 2016. https://med.stanford.edu/newborns/professional-education/circumcision/complications.html. Accessed 18 Dec 2021.

  • Iacob S, Feinn R, Sardi L. Systematic review of complications arising from male circumcision. BJUI Compass. 2022;3:99–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.123.

  • Shabanzadeh D, Clausen S, Maigaard K, Fode M. Male circumcision complications— a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Urology. 2021;152:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.041.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Frisch M, Simonsen J. Cultural background, non-therapeutic circumcision and the risk of meatal stenosis and other urethral stricture disease: two nationwide register-based cohort studies in Denmark 1977–2013. Surgeon. 2018;16:107–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.11.002.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Hammond T. A preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int. 1999;83:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1085.x.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Hammond T, Carmack A. Long-term adverse outcomes from neonatal circumcision reported in a survey of 1008 men: an overview of health and human rights implications. Int J Hum Rights. 2017;21:189–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1260007.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Tirana R, Othman D, Gad D, Elsadek M, Fahmy MAB. Pigmentary complications after non‑medical male circumcision. BMC Urol. 2022;22:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-00999-5.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Van Howe R. Incidence of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision in a primary care setting. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2006;45:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/000992280604500108.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Acimi S, Abderrahmane N, Debbous L, Bouziani N, Mansouri J, Acimi M, et al. Prevalence and causes of meatal stenosis in circumcised boys. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18:89.e1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.008.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Dailey D. Sexual expression and ageing. In: Berghorn F, Schafer D, editors. The dynamics of aging: original essays on the processes and experiences of growing old. Boulder: Westview Press; 1981. p. 311–30.

  • Einstein G. From body to brain: considering the neurobiological effects of female genital cutting. Perspect Biol Med. 2008;51:84–97. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2008.0012.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Immerman RS, Mackey WC. A biocultural analysis of circumcision. Soc Biol. 1997;44:265–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.1997.9988953.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Immerman RS, Mackey WC. A proposed relationship between circumcision and neural reorganization. J Genet Psychol. 1998;159:367–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221329809596158.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Darby R, Svoboda JS. A rose by any other name? Rethinking the similarities and differences between male and female genital cutting. Med Anthropol Q. 2007;21:301–23. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2007.21.3.301.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Bell K. Genital cutting and Western discourses on sexuality. Med Anthropol Q. 2005;19:125–48.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Johnsdotter S. Girls and boys as victims: asymmetries and dynamics in European public discourses on genital modifications in children. International seminar FGM/C: from medicine to critical anthropology. 2017. https://www.academia.edu/35343412/Girls_and_Boys_as_Victims_Asymmetries_and_dynamics_in_European_public_discourses_on_genital_modifications_in_children. Accessed 18 Dec 2021.

  • Gruenbaum E, Earp BD, Shweder RA. Reconsidering the role of patriarchy in upholding female genital modifications: analysis of contemporary and pre-industrial societies. Int J Impot Res. 2022. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41443-022-00581-5.

  • Johnsdotter S. Discourses on sexual pleasure after genital modifications: the fallacy of genital determinism (a response to J. Steven Svoboda). Glob Discourse. 2013;3:256–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2013.805530.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Bollinger D, Van Howe R. Alexithymia and circumcision trauma: a preliminary investigation. Int J Men’s Health. 2011;10:184–95. https://doi.org/10.3149/jmh.1002.184.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Tye M, Sardi L. Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision. Int J Impot Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00553-9.

  • Coates S. Can babies remember trauma? Symbolic forms of representation in traumatized infants. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2016;64:751–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065116659443.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Miani A, Di Bernardo G, Højgaard A, Earp B, Zak P, Landau A, et al. Neonatal male circumcision is associated with altered adult socio-affective processing. Heliyon. 2020;6:e05566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05566.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Bollinger D, Chapin G. Childhood genital cutting as an adverse childhood experience. Intact Am. 2019. http://adversechildhoodexperiences.net/CGC_as_an_ACE.pdf.

  • Anonymous. Regrowing my foreskin: how I’m overcoming the trauma of infant circumcision. The Journal/Queen’s University. 2021. https://www.queensjournal.ca/story/2021-01-21/postscript/regrowing-my-foreskin/. Accessed 18 Dec 2021.

  • Massie L. Rapid response: male circumcision and unexplained male adolescent suicide. Br Med J. 2010:340. https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/11/02/male-circumcision-and-unexplained-male-adolescent-suicide.

  • Morgan J. Gay man, who suffered from depression over his circumcision, kills himself. Gay Star News. 2016. https://www.gaystarnews.com/article/gay-man-suffered-depression-circumcision-kills/. Accessed 18 Dec 2021.

  • Toureille C. Jewish man who endured a botched circumcision as a baby reveals it left him with years of pain and drove him to contemplate suicide. Daily Mail/UK. 2019. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7261193/Man-admits-botched-circumcision-baby-led-consider-suicide.html. Accessed 18 Dec 2021.

  • Watson L. Unspeakable mutilations: circumcised men speak out. Ashburton: Create Space Publishing; 2014.

  • Watson L, Golden T. Male circumcision grief: effective and ineffective therapeutic approaches. N Male Stud Int J. 2017;6:109–25. https://www.newmalestudies.com/OJS/index.php/nms/article/view/261/317.

    Google Scholar

  • Toubia N. Female genital mutilation and the responsibility of reproductive health professionals. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994;46:127–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(94)90227-5.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Montgomery S. Controversy over circumcision persists. The Exponent. 2021. https://www.purdueexponent.org/city_state/article_b95b2cf7-c0ef-51f2-8308-fad024fb1380.html. Accessed 18 Dec 2021.

  • Wisdom T. Questioning circumcisionism: feminism, gender equity, and human rights. Righting Wrongs J Hum Rights. 2012;2:1–32.

    Google Scholar

  • Wisdom T. Constructing phallic beauty: foreskin restoration, genital cutting and circumcisionism. In: McNamara S, editor. (Re)Possessing beauty: politics, poetics, change. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press; 2014. p. 93–134.

  • Özer M, Timmermans F. An insight into circumcised men seeking foreskin reconstruction: a prospective cohort study. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32:611–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0223-y.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 1995;95:314–7. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.95.2.314.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Foreskin restorers: insights into motivations, successes, challenges, and experiences with medical and mental health professionals – An abridged summary of key findings (2024)

    FAQs

    What are the results of foreskin restoration? ›

    Long-term results indicate that FR is durable with regards to anatomical reconstruction however foreskin function especially in relation to sexual function was compromised in about 25 %. Foreskin retractability after surgery predicted retractability in adulthood for the flaccid but not erect penis.

    Is foreskin restoration worth it? ›

    Some individuals claim that foreskin restoration improves penile sensitivity during sexual intercourse. But there isn't enough research to support this. Some also claim the procedure provides natural lubrication during sexual intercourse.

    What is the difference between restored and natural foreskin? ›

    The natural foreskin is composed of smooth dartos muscle tissue (called the peripenic muscle), large blood vessels, extensive innervation, outer skin, and inner mucosa. The process of foreskin restoration seeks to regenerate some of the tissue removed by circumcision, as well as provide coverage of the glans.

    Can I keep my foreskin after circumcision? ›

    Foreskin restoration is something that you can do if you were circumcised as a child. It is a method or practice to regrow your foreskin. There are a few different options for foreskin restoration including surgery and skin stretching tools.

    What is the motivation for foreskin restoration? ›

    Adverse physical, sexual, emotional/psychological and self-esteem impacts attributed to circumcision had motivated participants to seek foreskin restoration. Most sought no professional help due to hopelessness, fear, or mistrust. Those who sought help encountered trivialization, dismissal, or ridicule.

    Does foreskin restoration restore nerves? ›

    Today, some men do it for sexual reasons, though the nerves lost during circumcision cannot be regenerated. Others do it to achieve emotional wholeness, believing they are victims of genital mutilation.

    Why do men want foreskin? ›

    According to some health experts, the foreskin is the floppy disk of the male anatomy, a once-important flap of skin that no longer serves much purpose. But the foreskin also has many fans, who claim it still serves important protective, sensory and sexual functions. “Every mammal has a foreskin,” says Dr.

    What do doctors do with leftover foreskin? ›

    The usual procedure for managing the extracted foreskin is to dispose of it in the biological waste, but some studies have revealed the huge potential of foreskin cells as an important resource for medical research.

    Is it true that uncircumcised feels better? ›

    The review found that in the most accurate studies, circumcision had no negative effects on sexual function, sensitivity, pain, or pleasure during sexual intercourse.

    How can I permanently pull my foreskin back naturally? ›

    One of the best home remedies for phimosis to cure phimosis without surgery is to gently stretch and retract the foreskin with the help of warm water and coconut oil. All you need to do is pour some lukewarm water over the penis, lubricate it with coconut oil and then try to retract the foreskin gently and gradually.

    What are the benefits of foreskin? ›

    The foreskin has several roles in penis health:
    • Protects the head of the penis.
    • Maintains sensation and response to stimulation.
    • Reduces friction with sexual penetration.
    • Contributes to immune system function due to the presence of immune cells.

    Should my foreskin cover the head when erect? ›

    In adulthood, the foreskin is normally loose enough to be fully retracted. In this case, the glans (including its root) should be fully exposed. During erection, the foreskin retracts by itself, exposing the entire glans or at least part of it.

    Is it harder to get erect when circumcised? ›

    However, after circumcision the patients had more erection confidence (4.42 ± 0.58 preoperatively and 4.58 ± 0.53 postoperatively, p < 0.001), and had increased difficulty in maintaining erections to complete the intercourse (p = 0.010).

    How much longer do circumcised guys last? ›

    In line with consistent studies and review results, circumcision appears to have no correlation to Intravagin*l ejacul*tory Latency Time which is a clinically approved marker to assess Premature ejacul*tion. This clearly puts away the prospect of considering Circumcision as a cure for Premature ejacul*tion.

    Does foreskin restoration increase size? ›

    Over time, the skin stretches and may be able to cover the entirety of the glans. However, limited clinical data is available to determine whether stretching the skin produces the desired effect of a foreskin.

    Is keeping foreskin retracted good? ›

    Retraction of the foreskin should not be forced. This may cause pain and bleeding and can lead to scarring and adhesions (where skin is stuck to skin). As your son begins to toilet train, teach him how to retract his foreskin, this will get him used to this necessary step during urination.

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: The Hon. Margery Christiansen

    Last Updated:

    Views: 6244

    Rating: 5 / 5 (70 voted)

    Reviews: 85% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: The Hon. Margery Christiansen

    Birthday: 2000-07-07

    Address: 5050 Breitenberg Knoll, New Robert, MI 45409

    Phone: +2556892639372

    Job: Investor Mining Engineer

    Hobby: Sketching, Cosplaying, Glassblowing, Genealogy, Crocheting, Archery, Skateboarding

    Introduction: My name is The Hon. Margery Christiansen, I am a bright, adorable, precious, inexpensive, gorgeous, comfortable, happy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.